Handling of private/confidential groupware objects
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Wed Dec 7 16:55:52 CET 2005
Am Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 16:30 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> In Martin's example, one extra calendar would be enough,
> as this is only access control to one person (the user).
It would be one extra "hidden" folder for _every_ calendar folder which
contains at least one of those private entries.
> Because all users have calendar folder, one named private
> for each of them is enough.
No, using one private folder for all private data would be bad. It would
require mangling and demangling....
> But, as you can see from my other email, you might need more combinations
> of folders.
Please elaborate this. I sofar do not understand this point.
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the format