Text Remarks

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Oct 13 11:19:44 CEST 2004

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 11:15, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2004 16:29, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > later:
> >     This is all quite restricted, but this is the only way Outlook can
> > do it... This does not seem to be a good and correct statement to make,
> > because both client worlds clash here, not this is not the fault of one
> > alone. Proposed fix: Remove the paragraph.
> I saw David already removed this one.
> I don't like removing it.

> There have already been several requests for
> stuff that is difficult to implement on various clients, and we want to
> state this somewhere.
> Perhaps what we really need is a description of the problems faced, when
> someone wants to add new features. Somewhere in the very first pages. In
> this area we could also write down why we chose to make our own format.

I agree that we should add a section about explaning our reasons,
it was only important to me to not falsely blame that on Outlook,
because it really shed the wrong light on the issue.

Can you propose a paragraph?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2145 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/format/attachments/20041013/ff6c878a/attachment.p7s>

More information about the format mailing list