"Last action" fields
bernhard at intevation.de
Fri Oct 8 16:35:58 CEST 2004
On Thursday 07 October 2004 17:28, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2004 15:08, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > We do not have last-action in the specs yet,
> I'm fine with adding it and ignoring it in Kontact, but that's probably not
> what we want for full interoperability.
> The real question is whether we need to change korganizer's invitation
> handling or not. But I don't know enough about korganizer's invitation
> handling AND about Outlook's invitation handling to provide any useful
So we need more input from Joon here?
Actually from my occasional testing it seems that Outlook
works much better than KOrganizerin this regard.
So do you need a description of what outlook does?
> > I was immedeately thinking about doing the last action per recipient,
> > but it well might be that this modelling is enough.
> This is even more detailed, more than Joon requested, so I'm guessing
> Outlook (or the connector) can't do that?
Yes, but I don't know.
> > > The question is, obviously: do we need to generate such a number when
> > > the first invitation is sent from kontact?
> > > Does anyone know if (and where) this number is used in iTIP?
> > No idea, maybe you can ask someone at kolab-devel and kdepim
> > if they know more?
> Asking a question about outlook's owner-appointment-id on kdepim?
Well there are probably more iTIP experts on there...
This is about learning what we need for groupware, so I wouldn't
mind asking if iTIP has something like this.
> Doesn't look like the right place to me.
The decision is up to you of course.
I only wanted to say the the question might go beyond this format list. ;)
> I'm not on kolab-devel at the moment; should I be? (we really have too many
Yes, you should.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2145 bytes
More information about the format