Extra Header field

[Joon Radley]

Hi Martin

> > I really don't like duplicating information, but in this 
> case I don't 
> > mind doing an exception.
> 
> > Unless anyone objects, I will update the spec monday when I get my 
> > workstation back from repairs (can't build the spec here :( ).
> 
> I like the idea because it speeds up the common case. But I 
> think that the header should only be a hint for efficiency 
> but not a requirement.

Well if there is no header it is treated as a RFC2822/non-Kolab message, so
the XML format will be lost. It should be a requirement.

Best Regards

Joon Radley
Radley Network Technologies CC
Cell: +27 (0)83 368 8557
Fax: +27 (0)12 998 4346
E-mail: joon at radleys.co.za