[Kolab-devel] annotations patch in c-client what is the status?

[Martin Konold]

On Friday 05 June 2009 08:39:16 Richard Bos wrote:

Hi Richard,

> >  - security fixes versus blackmail
>
> Indeed, but have a look at this page: http://panda.com/imap/
> and see the number of fixes that have been made to the
> c-client already.  Would a fork be able to provide the same
> number of fixes?

Claiming to have fixed a security problem without disclosure is simply 
blackmailing. I am not interested in dealing with these people. 

Maybe it is better to invest either in a fork or in another solution.

Regards,
-- martin

-- 
e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Sitz: Adolfstraße 23, 70469 Stuttgart, Partnerschaftsregister Stuttgart PR 126
http://www.erfrakon.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kolab.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090605/a4fd6ed1/attachment.html>